Yesterday, I had a private meeting with Steve Lamb, the Deputy Director of the UK Borders Agency Sponsorship Unit, who came to my office to discuss the new sponsorship requirements. I thought it would be worthwhile to report back to you on our discussions.
Firstly, allow me to put some context to the importance of this meeting by providing a little back ground on Steve Lamb. Steven Lamb ran Work Permits UK successfully for many years. The department became so successful that David Blunkett moved it from DFE to the Home Office when he moved from Education, to become the Home Secretary. In recent years Dr John Reed said “the Home was not fit for purpose”, he was responding to the case where the Home Office was found releasing prisoners back into society who should have been deported. Steve was the person offered the task of sorting out the prisoner issue, which he did with ruthless efficiency.
I have over 20 years experience in immigration and in that time Steve has stood out as one of the most highly respected people within the Home Office. Those of us who are in daily contact with him and know immigration from working within it and now as a private Immigration consultant regard him highly.
Our discussions covered several key areas. I would like to share a few key points of our meeting.
Is 60,000 the maximum number the Home Office can cope with?
Steve’s staffs have been busy answering a steady stream of questions from many UK employers asking if the Home Office had a cap of 60,000 licences. This came on the back of the information leaked to Global Visas from the UK Borders Agency which was picked up in the press.
“I agreed to highlight going forward and leaks should not be listened to”. He continued by stating: “The official line is that the Home Office does not have a fixed upper figure of cases they can cope with”.
”Outside of the meeting I continue to urge you to remember no organisation has an infinite amount of resources regardless of their best intentions. The more companies that leave it to the last minute the greater the strain will be on the Home Office resources. To avoid this, the best thing to do is apply early”.
Are Companies leaving it too late?
Ironically the next point we covered was if I knew of the reason why companies we not submitting their applications yet?
“The UK Borders Agency is concerned that companies may be leaving everything a little too late. It was noted that some Immigration consultants are suggesting not registering yet. I could only offer the fact that Global Visas are fully functional in the new Tier 2 Points Based Scheme and are assisting our clients to register now”.
Steve made it clear that he sees no commercial benefit in delaying registration and he could not provide an explanation as to why some advisors are not yet registering their clients. The Home Office are now going to step up their marketing campaign to encourage employers to recognise the seriousness of this legislation.
The analogy used by Steve to address the issue of getting companies to register in time was to ask clients to view the registration as a tax return deadline which must be completed and if left too late companies could suffer penalties. Companies are expected to have the relevant records when paying an employer, they would not pay anyone cash in a brown envelop. So why would they not keep correct Immigration records?
How Many licences per organisation?
“It was agreed an organisation should hold as many licences as fits the organisational chart but if they wish they can just have one. Licences in line with the organisation allow regional managers to issues their own work permits and comply with immigration legislation at branch level. It would be difficult for one individual centrally to monitor every change within the company of which the Home Office now requires to be kept informed about. Home Office must be informed on employers who are taking 10 days unplanned leave, a job title change etc”.
Steve stressed that “It was made clear that if a local manager employs a person who does not qualify or who they should not have hired, they could expose the organisation to a fine and/or other actions taken regarding continued registration. It is currently difficult to foresee how many licences will be applied for in the coming months as no one knows how many licences each organisation will elect to secure”.
What do organisations need to do about Fraudulent Documents?
“The organisation will be expected to protect themselves against exposure of employing people on forged or misrepresented documents. There are endless ways people misrepresent themselves from a little white lie on a CV to pretending to be Polish when they are Russian to claiming to hold working rights. An employer is expected to protect themselves against people misrepresenting themselves. Failure to do so will leave the organisation and individuals exposed under the new legislation”.
Over all it was a very worthwhile meeting which highlighted just how much is happening within the UK Immigration. From biometrics to employer visits. Immigration is changing at such a fast pace and one of the biggest issues is keeping people informed.